Legal Opinion

People v. Djekich

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1991No. D010824PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, Acting P. J.

Following a plea of nolo contendere to 10 misdemeanor counts of violating San Diego County Zoning Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance) section 1006(a) (using land or building zoned single-family residential for a different purpose), Ratko Djekich was placed on probation after imposition of sentence was suspended. Among other conditions, he was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine for each count. After unsuccessfully trying to have the fine probation condition modified by staying nine fines pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 654, Djekich appealed to the appellate department of the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. Asean D.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. GangemiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API