Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Dove Manufacturing Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

This is an appeal by a corporation entitled Dove Manufacturing Company from a judgment of the circuit court entered upon an arbitration award in favor of one Harry E. Harrell. During the proceedings the appellant Dove Manufacturing Company was referred to as “the respondent” and Harrell as “the petitioner.” For purposes of our consideration of the issues before us, we adopt those designations of the parties.

By a contract dated January 28, 1961, petitioner (Harrell) agreed'to sell and respondent (Dove) agreed to buy more than fifty per cent of the common stock of the Imperial Manufacturing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jacob v. Pacific Export Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wagner v. Columbia Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mahaffy v. GrayOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Bostick v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API