Legal Opinion

Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1946PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVERSED.

Action by plaintiff, an employee of the defendant company and a contributor to its hospital fund, to recover medical and hospital expenses incurred for the treatment of injuries sustained. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Under the rules of the Hospital Department, to which the plaintiff had by contract agreed, he would not be entitled to benefits from the fund if his injuries were sustained in a "fight or brawl." The defendant affirmatively alleges that it was agreed that the decision of the authorized officials of the department should be final and conclusive, that…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  4. Associated Hospital Service, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API