Legal Opinion

Bostick v. White

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1965Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment which affirmed an arbitration award adversely to defendant. The arbitration had been required by the terms of a contract between the parties. Performance of the contract had been the subject matter of the dispute. The procedure provided by ORS 33.210 to 33.340 was followed.

Defendant, in challenge to the award, claimed that the arbitrators “* * * so imperfectly executed [their powers] that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject-matter submitted was not made.” ORS 33.320 (4). The real argument is that arbitration was not a satisfactory way to solve…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrell v. Dove Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API