Legal Opinion
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1981No. A8005-02667, CA 18146, SC 27607PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*51TONGUE, J.
The question to be decided in this case is whether an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of a contract is an appealable order.
Petitioner Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. (Kiewit) filed a “petition for order directing arbitration” pursuant to ORS 33.230,1 alleging that a construction contract between it and respondent Port of Portland (Port) provided that any controversy between the parties arising out of the contract shall be submitted to arbitration according to the provisions of ORS 33.210 et seq; that claims by it against the Port totaling…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Brewer v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Dewart v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Teamsters Union Local 695 v. County of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ThreetOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Snider v. Production Chemical Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Berger Farms v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Union County School District No. 1 v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Marr v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.