Alby v. Banc One Financial
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
A condition in a deed that constitutes an unreasonable restraint on alienation is void. But the condition must be shown to be an actual “restraint” and also to be “unreasonable.” We hold that the conveyance of a fee simple determinable subject to an automatic reverter if the grantee should encumber the property during the grantor’s lifetime is neither a restraint on alienation nor unreasonable when freely bargained for by the parties.
This case concerns a piece of land worth in excess of $100,000 that was conveyed within the family for $15,000. The real estate contract and deed, both of which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robroy Land Co. v. PratherWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Jupiter Oil Co. v. SnowTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Procter v. Foxmeyer Drug Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Meresse v. StelmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Meresse v. StelmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Alby v. Banc One FinancialWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Alby v. Banc One FinancialWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Alby v. Banc One FinancialCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003