Legal Opinion

Jupiter Oil Co. v. Snow

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1992No. D-0811PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

This is a suit to construe a mineral deed. Jupiter Oil Company (Jupiter) seeks, in addition to damages, a declaratory judgment to establish its claimed ownership of one-half of the minerals underlying a tract upon which Gene M. Snow (Snow), a mineral lessee, has produced oil and gas. The trial court held that Jupiter owned a one-half interest in all minerals underlying the tract. The court of appeals reversed, 802 S.W.2d 354, based on the application of the “repugnant to the grant” rule of Alford v. Krum, 671 S.W.2d 870 (Tex.1984). We hold that Alford v. Krum is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sun Oil Co. v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Concord Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Francis v. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Mitchell Energy Corporation, Maurice Sherman Bliss, Intervenors v. Samson Resources CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Energetics, Ltd v. WhitmillMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Longoria v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API