Legal Opinion

Alby v. Banc One Financial

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2006No. 75001-7PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1 — The issue in this case is whether a restriction in a deed, which provides that the deeded property automatically reverts to the grantor if the property is mortgaged or encumbered during the life of the grantor, is a valid restraint on alienation. We find the clause to be reasonable and justified by the interests of the parties and, therefore, valid. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

C. Johnson, J.

FACTS

¶2 In 1992, Eugene and Susan Alby sold part of their family farm to their niece, Lorri Brashler, and her husband, Larry Brashler. Although the property’s market value was $100,000, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCausland v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Alby v. Banc One FinancialCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. KENNEWICK PUBLIC HOSP. DIST. v. HaweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Kennewick Public Hospital District v. HaveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API