Robroy Land Co. v. Prather
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hicks, J. —
The issue in this case is whether either the rule against perpetuities or the rules against restraints upon alienation invalidate the following agreement:
We, Isaac W. Prather and Bonnie A. Prather, his wife, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) paid to us by Robert C. Robbins and Isabel Faye Robbins, his wife, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant to them and to their heirs, personal representatives and assigns, the first right of refusal of purchasing the following described real estate in Thurston County, Washington:[ 1 ]
The Robbins' recorded the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Weber v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.