Legal Opinion

Slater v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1914No. 18,500PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court. Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

In this action the servant recovered judgment for injuries caused by the failure of the master to comply with the provisions of the factory act requiring the guarding of dangerous machinery.

The main question raised by the defendant’s appeal is whether the action is barred by the one year’s statute of limitations, which provides that “an action upon *228a statute for penalty or forfeiture, except where the statute imposing it prescribes a different limitation,” shall be barred within one year. (Civ. Code, § 17, subdiv. 4.) The answer depends upon…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Hornor v. HenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Caspar v. LewinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1953
  2. Roseberry v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Smith Engineering Works v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Hollinger v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Truman v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API