Legal Opinion

Hollinger v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1924No. 24,857PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On July 5, 1922, the plaintiffs brought this action against Dickinson county, claiming damages because of a traction engine belonging to them having been injured by the collapse of a bridge on May 17, 1920. A demurrer to the petition was sustained upon the ground that the action was barred by the two-year statute of limitation, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The question involved is whether the period of limitation to be applied is three years, on the ground that the action is one “upon a liability created by statute, other than a forfeiture or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Douglass v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Beeler v. Butte & London Copper Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. Liebing v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Earl D. Thomas v. The Pick Hotels Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Kirtland v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API