Caspar v. Lewin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Wyandotte court of common pleas. Hugh J. Smith, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*606The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
Tony Caspar was an employee of the defendants, and while at work for them in their establishment suffered injuries which resulted in his death. The plaintiff, his widow, as administratrix of his estate, sued the defendants for the consequent damages in an action founded upon the factory act. She recovered, and the defendants appeal.
The act referred to is chapter 356 of the Laws of 1903 (Gen. Stat. 1909, §§4676-4683), the title of which reads as follows:
“An act requiring-safeguards for the protection of all persons employed or laboring in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- McAllister v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. LullMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Maurizi v. Western Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Camenzind v. Freeland Furniture Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.