Legal Opinion
Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 16, 1953No. KC-199PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOTT, Chief Judge.
The present issue, tried to the court under Rule 43(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., and involving no factual controversy, requires determination of two basic questions: (1) May the corporate defendants, in this suit under the Sherman and Clayton Anti-Trust Acts, 1 avail themselves of the Kansas statutes of limitation, if applicable? and (2) What is the period of limitation under the facts pleaded?
It is conceded by counsel for each of the parties that there is no federal statute of limitations dealing specifically with a suit for “threefold the damages” 2 where, as…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sun Theatre Corp. v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- The Crummer Company and R. E. Crummer & Company v. Jessie Ball Du Pont, as Trustees, Etc., of the Last Will and Testament of Alfred I. Dupont, Deceased, Clyde C. Pierce and Clyde C. Pierce Corporation, & Cross-Appellants v. R. E. Crummer & Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.