Legal Opinion

Roseberry v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1926No. 26,287PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued for $500 actual and $3,000 punitive damages caused by the defendant’s fraudulent sale to her of two shares of worthless stock in the Mexican Gulf Land and Development Company. Verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000, and the defendant appeals.

1. At the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, thé defendant *577demurred thereto. The demurrer was overruled. He urges that “the demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained,” and says:

“By an. examination of the petition it is manifest that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malone v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  2. Nevins v. NevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Stalker v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Booth v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  5. Cady v. CaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Branner v. KlaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Stoner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Atkinson v. Herington Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Fulton v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API