Legal Opinion
Stephan v. Lagerqvest
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1921No. Civ. No. 3315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action for the recovery of the possession of certain war savings certificates issued by the United States government. The defendants had judgment and the plaintiff appeals.
The facts of the case are of a complex character. Appellant was the owner of a restaurant and, acting through one E. W. Elder, her agent, sold the place to respondent Lagerqvest. Elder conducted his negotiations in the name of Business Investment Company. The sale was evidenced by three certain writings. One of these, in the form of a letter addressed to Business Investment Company and signed by both parties to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Blahnik v. Small Farms Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Daly v. RuddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Staff Mortgage and Investment Corporation v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Crawford v. FranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- MacDonald v. Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Huffman v. WikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977