Gardiner v. McDonogh
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action in claim and delivery to recover possession of a lot of beans. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal from ar. order denying their motion for a new trial.
The only points necessary to be considered on this appeal are alleged errors in the admission of evidence and in instructions given to the jury on behalf of plaintiffs.
The undisputed evidence in the case tended to prove the following facts: The D. E. Allison Company was a commission house engaged in business in the city and county of San Francisco, buying and selling produce on its own account,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Butler v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. GoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Ontario Deciduous Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. Cutting Fruit Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Remsberg v. Hackney Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.