Tremaine v. Tremaine
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant who was ordered on February 14, 1992, to pay lump sum alimony of $350,000 and periodic alimony of $1000 per week until June 1, 1995, retroactive to June 1, 1990, to the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the trial court (1) was precluded from ordering the payment of lump sum alimony by the parties’ separation agreement dated December 2,1987, which was incorporated into the dissolution judgment dated February 5,1988, (2) improperly excluded the testimony of the plaintiff’s former attorney on the basis of the attorney-client privilege, and (3) improperly…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Domo v. McCarthyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Tremaine v. TremaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Standish v. StandishConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Tremaine v. TremaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- First Conn. Capitol C. v. F.W. Rest., No. Cv 94 31 38 12 S (Jun. 27, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.