Legal Opinion
Standish v. Standish
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 13, 1996No. 14079PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
In this marital dissolution action, the plaintiff appeals from certain financial awards by the trial court. The plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly (1) modified its orders in an amended memorandum of decision in response to a motion for articulation, (2) exercised its discretion in making an order of property distribution, and (3) vacated an order requiring the maintenance of life insurance by the defendant for the benefit of the plaintiff.
On September 19,1994, after a full trial of the dissolution action, the court entered an order of dissolution as well as certain financial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Sunbury v. SunburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Koper v. KoperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Tremaine v. TremaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Von Kohorn v. Von KohornConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Standish v. Standish, No. Fa 92-0 50 79 79 S (Nov. 23, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Wheelabrator Bridgeport, L.P. v. BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016