Legal Opinion
Barnard v. Barnard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 27, 1990No. 13822PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
On February 4, 1986, the parties’ marriage was dissolved by a judgment that incorporated the provisions of a twenty-one page separation agreement (agreement) of the parties, also dated February 4, 1986. On December 1, 1988, the defendant husband filed a motion for interpretation or clarification of that agreement maintaining that the parties were unable to agree upon the interpretation of Article III of that agreement. That article is captioned “Alimony and Support and Education.” The trial court, Nigro, J., held a hearing1 on this motion. The defendant has appealed from the trial court’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.