Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Fitzgerald
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
GUNDERSON, J.:
Injured when appellant Southern Pacific’s engine collided with a freight car on which he was working, respondent Fitzgerald sought damages for personal injuries and lost wages pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Following a judgment for $493,569 and an order denying a new trial, Southern Pacific has appealed, urging that the district court erred in refusing a continuance, excluding evidence, instructing the jury, permitting a portion of respondent’s closing argument, and admitting expert opinion evidence. These contentions all lack merit.
1. On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Bernard C. Taylor v. The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Plourd v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Kubista v. RomaineWashington Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. BeckwithNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Soria v. Sierra Pacific Airlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Ringle v. BrutonNevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.