Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Bacon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 62323-6PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

We accepted certification of this case from the Court of Appeals to review a trial court ruling that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136v, does not preempt state negligence claims for failure to warn and inadequate label. We hold FIFRA does preempt state inadequate labeling and failure to warn claims to the extent they rely on a showing of inadequate labeling. We thus reverse the verdict of the trial court.

At issue are the FIFRA provisions permitting state regulation of sale and use of registered pesticides, but restricting state authority over…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. v. EggertWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ryan v. Brunswick Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API