Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 6, 1944No. 4-7285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoFaddin, J.

The question here is whether appellant is liable for the damages sustained by appellees who used anti-freeze in automobile radiators. Thirty-nine plaintiffs each filed a separate action for damages against' appellant. Some were filling station operators who purchased the anti-freeze direct from appellant and used it in their own cars. Others were individuals or corporations in whose, cars the anti-freeze was placed by the filling station operators. The actions were consolidated, and from plaintiffs ’ judgments there is this appeal.. The appellant, Albert Ahrens, doing business as Wholesale…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Cunningham v. C. R. Pease House Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
  4. Clement v. RommeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GwilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dalrymple v. SinkoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  3. Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1950
  4. Williams v. Oklahoma Tire & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API