Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Gwilliams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 19, 1934No. 4-3579 and 4-3580PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial, resulting in judgments for the plaintiff, Norma Jean Gwilliams, a minor, by Eva Gwilliams, her next friend, and the plaintiff, Bobby Joyce Gwilliams, a minor, by R. L. Gwilliams, her next friend, and from these judgments in favor of plaintiffs, defendant, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company has appealed. A very short statement of the pleadings will suffice in these cases, as the facts will be set forth somewhat at length. The reason for so doing is that the sole question to be determined in each case is whether the facts, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Runyan v. GoodrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Drury v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Colyar v. Little Rock Bottling WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. SwillingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sencer v. Carl's MarketSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Colonna v. Rosedale Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  3. Green v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. H. J. Heinz Company v. DukeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API