Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Terry

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1896No. 15934PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

It is alleged in the complaint in this case, among other things, that defendants were engaged as copartners in the business of selling household furniture, and that among the wares dealt in by them were certain folding beds, which were represented and warranted by defendants to their customers and the public to be safe for use; that defendants in the course of said business sold and delivered one of said beds to a Mr. Apperson and his wife, and expressly represented and warranted to them that such bed was so constructed that itwould stand upright against the wall, and when wanted for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Heizer v. Kingsland & Douglass Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API