Clement v. Rommeck
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by Alice D. Clement against Arthur O. Gr. Rommeck, impleaded with Crosby & Company, for personal injuries. There was judgment sustaining a demurrer as to defendant Rommeck, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This case was brought to recover damages for an injury sustained by plaintiff while using a stove polish manufactured by defendant Crosby & Co. and sold to plaintiff by defendant Rommeck. . Both defendants demurred to the plaintiff’s declaration. The demurrer was sustained as to defendant Rommeck and overruled as to defendant Crosby & Co. Crosby & Co. brought the case here and the order overruling its demurrer was sustained. Clement v. Crosby & Co., 148 Mich. 293. The plaintiff has now brought the case here to review the order and judgment sustaining the demurrer of defendant Rommeck.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. MarshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Clement v. Crosby & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Craft v. Parker, Webb & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Hoover v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by19 opinions
- King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Peaslee-Gaulbert Co. v. McMath's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Shirley v. Drackett Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Pitman v. Lynn Gas & Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Darks v. Scudder-Gale Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.