Legal Opinion

Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1950No. Civ. 928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Complaint was filed October 12, 1950, y the plaintiff seeking to recover damages gainst the defendant for personal injuries eceived as the result of a delayed ex-ilosion of dynamite. Plaintiff, an emiloyee of Walco Construction Company, vas engaged in blasting power line post toles and was using dynamite caps purtoased toy his employer from the defendant, vhich caps were designed to be detonated ly electricity. Two theories are alleged ls the basis for the prayed recovery, one ounding in contract and the other in tort. Vs to the former, it is alleged that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Chapman Chemical Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Nelson v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Drury v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delta Oxygen Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. George Alexander v. Inland Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  4. Green v. Equitable Powder Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1951
  5. International Harvester Co. v. LandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API