Studner v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Laweeitoe, Judge:
Upon importation from Denmark, certain articles, covered by consumption entry 760456, were classified by tbe collector of customs as print rollers, with raised patterns of brass or brass and felt, used for printing designs, in paragraph 395 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 395), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of $5 each, plus 57 per centum ad valorem.
The claim relied upon by plaintiff is contained in an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Altman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Altman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.