Legal Opinion

Gerson v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1961No. Civ. 24972PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem.*

Petitioner is an applicant before the respondent commission for workmen’s compensation. By her petition here she seeks to annul that part of the award made by respondent commission which ordered that a portion of the amount awarded to her on account of self-procured medical and hospital expenses be paid directly to Hospital Service of Southern California, hereinafter called “Blue Cross. ’ ’ The relevant facts are:

On December 6, 1958, petitioner, hereinafter sometimes called “applicant,” sustained an injury to her spine while in the scope and course of her employment by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Corley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API