Gerson v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem.*
Petitioner is an applicant before the respondent commission for workmen’s compensation. By her petition here she seeks to annul that part of the award made by respondent commission which ordered that a portion of the amount awarded to her on account of self-procured medical and hospital expenses be paid directly to Hospital Service of Southern California, hereinafter called “Blue Cross. ’ ’ The relevant facts are:
On December 6, 1958, petitioner, hereinafter sometimes called “applicant,” sustained an injury to her spine while in the scope and course of her employment by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Corley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.