Legal Opinion

Corley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1971No. Civ. 11595PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter Applicant) seeks review and annulment of an order granting reconsideration and decision after reconsideration by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter Board).

Applicant was an employee of PI Land & Cattle Company (hereinafter Employer). Employer’s workmen’s compensation carrier is State Compensation Insurance Fund (hereinafter Carrier). (For convenience, Employer and Carrier jointly will be herein referred to as defendants.) In the course and scope of his employment, Applicant was severely injured while working with machinery installed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Conner v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Van Nuis v. Los Angeles Soap Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Carden v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API