Legal Opinion

Smith v. Neely

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1963No. 6975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Superior Court Judge.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract to sell land. Performance was ordered by the trial court. The seller-defendant has appealed, contending first, the plaintiff is barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, and second the contract enforced below was replaced by a second and different agreement.

The facts are that plaintiffs in 1954 took a lease with option to buy on certain land belonging to the defendants. The physical paper on which this arrangement was made was a single document. The option provision was to be exercised by January 15, 1958.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Warren R. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Barr v. PetzholdArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Riggs v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County v. State Ex Rel. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API