Smith v. Neely
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Superior Court Judge.
This is an action for specific performance of a contract to sell land. Performance was ordered by the trial court. The seller-defendant has appealed, contending first, the plaintiff is barred by the doctrine of unclean hands, and second the contract enforced below was replaced by a second and different agreement.
The facts are that plaintiffs in 1954 took a lease with option to buy on certain land belonging to the defendants. The physical paper on which this arrangement was made was a single document. The option provision was to be exercised by January 15, 1958.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Warren R. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Barr v. PetzholdArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Riggs v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Sanitary District No. 1 of Pima County v. State Ex Rel. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.