Peterson v. Betts
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
In this opinion, Clarence J. Peterson will be referred to as though he were the only plaintiff and respondent. W. J. Betts, when referred to as defendant or appellant, will be understood to include himself, his wife, and mother; and Petroleum Co. will designate the other defendant-appellant, General Petroleum Corporation of California.
In the court below, a verdict was rendered, and judgment entered thereon, against both defendants, and both have appealed. The case is susceptible of four different dispositions, affirmance as to both defendants, reversal as to both, and affirmance as to Betts…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mesher v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Casper Nationak Bank v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Enyeart v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- R. C. H. Covington Co. v. Masonic Temple Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Evans v. McKannaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bartlett v. HantoverWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Whipple v. Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Hughes v. Chehalis School District No. 302Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Kent v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Application of HagoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.