Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Hurst
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 28, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 9PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellants, Perry W. and Estelle V. Hurst, by oral agreement with Lee J. and Ilah A. Hurst, appellees, formed a partnership on or about September 25, 1950, for agricultural purposes. (Perry Hurst and Lee Hurst are brothers.) The partnership was dissolved by acts of the partners on March 31, 1954, and the appellees continued in possession and control of all the partnership assets, utilizing them for their own benefit. On June 11, 1954, appellants instituted an action for partnership accounting and division of assets. A receiver was appointed on February 27, 1957, to take over…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Kingsbery v. KingsberyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Mahurin v. SchmeckArizona Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Cauble v. HandlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Nichols v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.