Legal Opinion

MacRae v. MacRae

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1930No. Civil No. 2934PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Pinal county holding that Thomas MacRae, hereinafter called defendant, is the owner as his sole and separate property of certain lands described in the pleadings, as against John H. Betts, Jr., and Edna Betts, his wife, and Katherine Y. MacRae, which latter we shall hereinafter call plaintiff, and that they have no title or interest in the premises, and directing that Betts and his wife, the holders of the legal title to the property at the beginning of the action, execute a deed conveying it to defendant. The Betts filed a disclaimer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Day v. LownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Wright v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Kemp v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Murillo v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Linder v. Lewis, Roca, Scoville & BeauchampArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hanscom v. IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dawson v. McNaneyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Weiner v. RomleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API