Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Murdock

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 2, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 823PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

The confusion in nomenclature shown by the defendant’s pleadings in this action points up the confusion existing in the law of landlord and tenant. In this field, the law of property rights have been blended with the law of contracts to such an extent that, depending upon what court is speaking, the practitioner is left in a quandary as to what law applies.

This quandary arose in an action by DAVID H. MURDOCK, dba DAVID A. MURDOCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-appellee, against ROCKFORD R. RIGGS, Defendant-appellant, and JULIA W. RIGGS, his wife, for rentals due and owing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Automobile Supply Co. v. Scene-In-Action Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sancourt Realty Corp. v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Smith v. NeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Dorcich v. Time Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ringwood Assocs., Ltd. v. Jack's of Route 23, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Richter v. Dairy Queen of Southern Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. Jack Frost Sales, Inc. v. Harris Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Lee Development Co. v. PappCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Dushoff v. Phoenix CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API