Legal Opinion
Brodvin v. Hertz Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1980No. 74 Civ. 4621 (CHT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This diversity action arose out of an automobile accident that occurred in New York on October 15, 1973. While driving an automobile manufactured by Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”), which is no longer a defendant in this action, 1 and owned by defendant Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”), plaintiff Elihu Brodvin collided with the vehicle in front of him. The complaint, filed on October 21, 1974, alleged that the accident and Brodvin’s injuries resulted from the defendants’ negligence in manufacturing, maintaining, and leasing a dangerously defective automobile.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Joseph J. Ricciuti v. Voltarc Tubes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Manhattan Fuel Co., Inc. v. New England Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Ensign v. KlekoskyNew York Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maricle v. SpiegelNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Assam v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Bunt v. Altec Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Zollinger v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.