Legal Opinion
Ensign v. Klekosky
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoward A. Zeller, J.
This is an action to recover on a check for $5,000 issued to plaintiff by defendant. At the close of the trial there was a directed verdict for plaintiff for $5,000. From the transcript of .the trial record it appears that, notwithstanding the verdict directed for plaintiff, defendant then moved for a directed verdict in her favor 11 on all of the grounds set forth in the Civil Practice Act, § 549, and the relevant sections ”, and to set aside the verdict directed for plaintiff as contrary to law, the evidence and the facts. Defendant’s brief requests the granting of a motion for judgment in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. ConzoNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Abrahamson v. SteeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Ryan v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- First National Bank v. StalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- De Lisa v. Amica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Suffolk County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GeigerNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Brodvin v. Hertz Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Austin v. AustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Baumis v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984