Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1992No. B052986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendant on her complaint for declaratory relief and breach of insurance contract. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the uninsured motorist provisions of plaintiff’s policy did not afford coverage because plaintiff’s damages were not “caused by accident and [did not] arise out of the . . . use of the uninsured motor vehicle.”

Factual and Procedural Background

The complaint alleges the following: On June 28, 1986, Roger C. Rowe, plaintiff’s husband, was a customer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Utah Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HanselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. MacIasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. United Services Automobile Assn. v. LedgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Continental Heller v. AMTECH MECHANICAL SERV.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Julie R.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. California Automobile Insurance v. HoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Imperium Insurance v. Unigard InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  5. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. GrishamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API