Legal Opinion
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. Grisham
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 2004No. C045912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 Cal.Rptr.3d 809 (2004)
122 Cal.App.4th 563
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Robert A. GRISHAM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. C045912.
Court of Appeal, Third District.
September 20, 2004.
Johanson, Koons & Constantino and Alexander L. Constantino, Auburn, for Defendant and Appellant.
McDowall, Cotter, Vale, Bracco & Kelly and William D. McDowall for Plaintiff and Respondent.
DAVIS, Acting P.J.
"The cat will mew, and dog will have his day." (Shakespeare, Hamlet, act 5, scene 1.) Here, Dwayne Vandagriff's dog elected to have his day by biting Robert A.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Entz v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Civil Service Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Imperium Insurance v. Unigard InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- R. A. Stuchbery & Others Syndicate 1096 v. Redland InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lillian Gradillas v. Lincoln General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. LK Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Grange Insurance Association v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020