Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Sherman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 71Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $700 and had judgment in a trial without a jury. Defendants bring error. The record shows no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed. There is nothing we can review. It was held in Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569, quoting syllabus:

"In an action tried before the court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit Court Rule No. 45), the record presents no question which the Supreme Court can…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. Simons Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API