Legal Opinion
Cope-Swift Co. v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1923No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Plaintiff brought suit to recover for work and labor performed and material furnished under the following written order:
“Detroit, Mich., October 15th, 1918. “Cope Pattern Works,
“Detroit, Michigan.
“Gentlemen:
“Please ship the following to us at above address:
* ¡¡s M=
“All necessary patterns, castings and machine shop work for one 'Van Horn bottle filling and washing machine, from plans and specifications presented to you by Mr. Almon J. Cordrey.
*545“Please mail us once each week an itemized statement of the previous week’s work.
“John Schlaff Creamery Co.,
“Per John Schlaff, Mgr. “Furnish no goods…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George E. Lloyd & Co. v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Hirschmann v. Iron Range & Huron Bay RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Whitaker v. KilroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Hunt v. Stromberg Motor Devices Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Constantine v. Kalamazoo Beet Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murphy v. Frank P. Miller CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Wormley v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- American Employers' Ins. v. H. G. Christman & Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mayhew v. Edward G. Budd Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Lorren v. Baroda Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.