Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Kimler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1951No. Crim. 5046PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

By his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Charles Walker Kimler is attacking the right of this state to continue his imprisonment after he was released upon parole. He asserts that, in effect, the parole granted to him was a pardon. He also relies upon a judgment in Missouri by which he was released from custody following his arrest upon a warrant of extradition.

After having been convicted in this state and sentenced to life imprisonment under each of three separate judgments, the sentences to run concurrently, he was released upon *570parole and delivered into the custody of officers of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Matter of StraussSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Commonwealth v. Superintendent of Philadelphia County PrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. In Re MarzecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Kurtz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. MasseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. In Re BailleauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API