Legal Opinion
In Re Bailleaux
California Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1956No. Crim. 5808PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
By this petition for the writ of habeas corpus, Paul R. Bailleaux seeks his release from Folsom prison. The warden as respondent has filed a return. Issues of fact were raised which would ordinarily require a reference. In order to obviate the necessity for such a proceeding counsel for the petitioner and the respondent filed certain documents and have joined in a stipulation of facts in which it is agreed that the documents and the stipulation disclose all of the material facts and that matter may be disposed of on the record thus presented.
*260In September, 1939, the petitioner was convicted of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.