Legal Opinion
In Re Russell
California Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1974No. Crim. 17007PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
The legality of custody under an extradition warrant may be challenged in a habeas corpus proceeding on the ground the petitioner was not in the demanding state when the alleged crime was committed. (In re McBride (1953) 115 Cal.App.2d 538, 541 [254 P.2d 117]; In re Brewer (1943) 61 Cal.App.2d 388, 393 [143 P.2d 33]; In re Shoemaker (1914) 25 Cal.App. 551, 556-557 [144 P. 985]; Cal. Criminal Law Practice II (Cont.Ed.Bar) pp. 723-724; see Pen. Code, § 1548.2.) The question presented here is-whether a writ of habeas corpus discharging the petitioner on this ground bars a second…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Mattson v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- State of South Dakota v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.