Legal Opinion

People v. Moreno

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1984No. Crim. 16121PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICKLES, J.

Defendant Moreno was convicted by a jury of first degree burglary in connection with the entry of a garage attached to a dwelling. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460.) He appeals, contending: (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish first degree burglary; (2) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on first degree burglary; (3) the trial court erred in denying his section 995 motion; and (4) the trial court erred in failing to state adequate reasons for denial of probation.

Facts

On May 7, 1983, Raymond Briones (victim’s father) went to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Burgett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. State v. MurbachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API