Legal Opinion

People v. Wickersham

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1982No. Crim. 22406PublishedCited by 396 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This case raises several questions concerning a trial court’s duty to give instructions sua sponte in criminal cases. What standard should the trial court apply in determining whether to give instructions on necessarily included offenses? Did the evidence in the present case require instructions on voluntary manslaughter and second degree murder? Should the doctrine of “invited error” be invoked where the defense counsel has not articulated a deliberate tactical objection to required instructions?

I

Appellant was convicted of first degree murder in the shooting death of her…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by396 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API