Legal Opinion

Oregon v. Hass

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1975No. 73-1452PublishedCited by 1,321 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

This case presents a variation of the fact situation encountered by the Court in Harris v. New York, 401 U. S. 222 (1971): When a suspect, who is in the custody of a state police officer, has been given full Miranda warnings1 *715and accepts them, and then later states that he would like to telephone a lawyer but is told that this cannot be done until the officer and the suspect reach the station, and the suspect then provides inculpatory information, is that information admissible in evidence solely for impeachment purposes after the suspect has taken the stand and testified contrarily to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,321 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

1,316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API