Legal Opinion

People v. Crittenden

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. S010685PublishedCited by 448 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

Following the guilt and special circumstance phase of a capital trial, a jury found defendant Steven Edward Crittenden guilty of the first degree murders and the robbery of Katherine and William Chiapella *104(Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189, 211, 212.5).1 As to both murders, the jury found that defendant personally used a deadly weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)), and found true the special circumstance allegation that defendant committed the murders in the course of a robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(i)). With respect to the murder of Katherine, the jury found true the additional special…

2Cases cited156 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by448 opinions

  1. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API