United States v. William A. Bowen, United States of America v. Kevin W. Jarvis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal by the Government. The district court granted a suppression motion made by the defendants to exclude evidence relating to a polygraph examination given to one of the defendants and other evidence relating to an alleged conspiracy by the defendants to cover-up the circumstances during and after the examination. This appeal presents the issue of whether results of a polygraph examination and other evidence of the surrounding circumstances of the examination were properly excluded from trial as too prejudicial when the purpose of the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Robert J. Brown v. John F. Darcy, A/K/A Jack Darcy, an Individual Ducommun, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Frank De RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. JarvisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1987
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Richard W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bradford L. LockettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Diane CandoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CrumbyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.