Legal Opinion

United States v. William A. Bowen, United States of America v. Kevin W. Jarvis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1988No. 87-5156, 87-5180PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal by the Government. The district court granted a suppression motion made by the defendants to exclude evidence relating to a polygraph examination given to one of the defendants and other evidence relating to an alleged conspiracy by the defendants to cover-up the circumstances during and after the examination. This appeal presents the issue of whether results of a polygraph examination and other evidence of the surrounding circumstances of the examination were properly excluded from trial as too prejudicial when the purpose of the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Robert J. Brown v. John F. Darcy, A/K/A Jack Darcy, an Individual Ducommun, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Frank De RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. JarvisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1987

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Bradford L. LockettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Diane CandoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. CrumbyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API