Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank De Rosa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1986No. 84-1334PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Appellant De Rosa seeks reversal of the district court’s order denying dismissal of his indictment. He also seeks reversal of his convictions for filing false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341.
De Rosa challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury. In addition, he contends that his criminal convictions should be reversed because he had no duty to disclose the information requested by the government’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank CitroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James E. BusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Fred Fuchs and Roy D. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.