Legal Opinion

United States v. Bradford L. Lockett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1990No. 90-30012PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from convictions for drug-related crimes raises several significant issues, one of which involves standing to invoke a violation of the federal requirement for announcement before entry into a residence to serve a search warrant.

I

In June 1987, the Portland Police Bureau began investigating cocaine trafficking in the near north and northeast areas of the City of Portland, Oregon. Acting upon information supplied by a confidential informant, the police paid special heed to four individuals, Bradford Lockett, Herbert Lockett, Keith Horsley, and Marcella…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Moses v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Mariano MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Jermaine Boney, United States of America v. Donald A. HollomanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Thyrus Montez BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API